Kieran Healy

Posted
23 February 2003 @ 1pm

Tagged
Misc

Spiffy Tech II

Further messing with Movable Type plugins, designed to widen the distance between myself and the great unwashed masses trapped on BlogSpot. I installed SmartyPants and MT-Textile. SmartyPants gives typographically correct quotes “like this” (or ‘like this’) and also—hurray!—correct em-dashes as well as … wait for it … proper ellipses.

MT-Textile implements Dean Allen’s excellent Textile markup system, which makes entering formatted text much easier. You don’t have to worry about all the HTML tags, so you can concentrate on your writing more, but you still get the benefit of nicely-formatted text. For instance, you can do stuff like add emphasis, cite text (may look the same but is different—- that’s why structured documents are important!) and even have properly annotated acronyms WIVC. You can also do those tricky symbols really easily.(tm) Dean is working on a CMS called Textpattern, which I will not be able to resist using to manage my webpages once it’s done.

All of which is great fun for a type-freak such as myself who wants to see the text available online take advantage of the hundreds of years of experience that typographers and book-designers have accumulated in making stuff easy and pleasurable to read. If you really don’t care about type or design then of course all of this will just be boring. But it’s my view that if you really don’t care about type or design then you are a philistine.


7 Comments

Posted by
Larry C.
24 February 2003 @ 3am

So when are you changing to a more elegant typeface?
—philistine in Dearborn MI


Posted by
Kieran Healy
24 February 2003 @ 6am

I tried before, but kept getting complaints from people that they couldn’t read it properly. I think it was a problem with their browsers or something.


Posted by
Larry C.
24 February 2003 @ 9am

Well, I can’t wait until you try again, this sans-serif stuff gets on my nerves (a tiny bit).
:-)


Posted by
Liz Lawley
24 February 2003 @ 1pm

Ah, but until we have screens that emulate the resolution of printed type, sans-serif tends to be more readable on the screen (especially at small sizes). The serifs fail at low resolution, making the text look muddy rather than elegant.


Posted by
Garrett
25 February 2003 @ 10am

There’s always the option to offer both. I enjoy both Serif and Sans-Serif fonts (namely Georgia and Lucida Grande), but I don’t mind Verdana either so long as the size is good. I think your text is fine here.


Posted by
Garrett
25 February 2003 @ 10am

There’s always the option to offer both. I enjoy both Serif and Sans-Serif fonts (namely Georgia and Lucida Grande), but I don’t mind Verdana either so long as the size is good. I think your text is fine here.


Posted by
Garrett
25 February 2003 @ 10am

Hmm… MT errored the first time I hit post. If you could, please delete that duplicate and this comment. Thanks, sorry for the trouble.