Posted
7 April 2003 @ 3pm

Tagged
Politics

Pulitzers

Jacob Levy points out that the NYT only one a single Pulitzer price this year. But he also sensibly notes that this isn’t such a big deal: there were no NYT winners in 2000, for example.

Empirical Task: Visit bloggers who (unlike Jacob) suffer from acute Timesophobia and see whether any of them suggest the dearth of Pulitzers is a judgment on the malign influence of Howell Raines.

Thought Experiment: Assume the Times had won many Pulitzers, and ask whether Timesophobes would view this as a further indictment of a corrupt, backscratching liberal media establishment.


2 Comments

Posted by
ArchPundit
7 April 2003 @ 8pm

That is the great thing about Sullivan’s schtick. Anything is evidence of the ‘problem.’ There is no possible falsification that he can’t make fit the conspiracy.


Posted by
Heath
8 April 2003 @ 9am

Per Archpundit’s comment, this also is reminiscent of the Bush Administration, don’t you think?