Kieran Healy

Posted
20 April 2003 @ 2pm

Tagged
Sociology

Apt Quotations II

While we’re playing around with quotations, here’s a good one in praise of Globalization, from one of its earliest prophets. It clearly articulates the cultural and economic benefits of free trade and open markets and expresses the contemporary neoconservative agenda pretty well, I think.

[Free-market capitalism] has, through its exploitation of its world-market given a cosmopolitan character to production and consumption in every country. To the great chagrin of Reactionaries, it has drawn from under the feet of industry the national ground on which it stood. All established national industries have been … dislodged by new industries … that no longer work up indigenous raw material, but raw material drawn from the remotest zones; industries whose products are consumed, not only at home, but in every quarter of the globe. In place of old wants, satisfied by the production of the country, we find new wants, requiring for their satisfaction the products of distant lands and climes. In place of the old local and national seclusion and self-sufficiency, we have intercourse in every direction, universal interdependence of nations. And as in material, so in intellectual life. The intellectual creations of individual nations become common property. National one-sidedness and narrow-mindedness become more and more impossible, and from the numerous national and local literatures, there arises a world literature …
[B]y the rapid improvement of all instruments of production, by the immensely facilitated means of communication, even the most barbarian nations are drawn into civilization. The cheap prices of [the free market’s] commodities are the heavy artillery by which it batters down all Chinese walls, with which it forces the barbarians’ intensely obstinate hatred of foreigners to capitulate.

No prizes for guessing who this is.


7 Comments

Posted by
Mark
20 April 2003 @ 5pm

And I thought Karl Rove was bad…


Posted by
drat fink
20 April 2003 @ 6pm

its either karl or groucho marx, i always get them confused.


Posted by
Brad DeLong
20 April 2003 @ 7pm

Why no prizes? What else is a Social Studies B.A. good for?

I was appalled this semester to find out that only 1/10 of our entering econ grad students had ever read the Manifesto

Brad DeLong


Posted by
Dan Simon
20 April 2003 @ 8pm

Funny—both “apt quotations” look to me like wise, true, uplifting statements, that also happen to double as out-of-context quotations from creepy people with ruthless motives. Your accompanying commentaries suggest to me, though, that you consider the original context of the second (though not the first) to reflect badly on its content. Or have I misconstrued your point altogether?


Posted by
Larry C.
21 April 2003 @ 8am

Glad to see the old man getting a bit of exposure. Marx understood the ways of capital, and capital still rules the roost. With its usual methods!


Posted by
Dan Simon
21 April 2003 @ 12pm

One more question: what on earth does this quotation have to do with the “contemporary neoconservative agenda”? While I expect that most neoconservatives would agree with it, it’s more characteristic of Clinton-era DLC Democrats than today’s neoconservatives. After all, the latter—as you’ve probably noticed lately—tend to emphasize the world-civilizing influence of the USMC, rather than that of the WTO.


Posted by
Larry C.
22 April 2003 @ 1pm

Re Dan: it has to do, I believe, with the fact that capital, whether administered by Dems or Reps, continues to do its thing after all.