<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Builders, Defenders, etc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2003/05/12/builders-defenders-etc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2003/05/12/builders-defenders-etc/</link>
	<description>Sociology and other distractions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:33:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Invisible Adjunct</title>
		<link>http://www.kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2003/05/12/builders-defenders-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-1541</link>
		<dc:creator>Invisible Adjunct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kieranhealy.org/wordpress/?p=410#comment-1541</guid>
		<description>This is a broad generalization and there are, of course, lots of exceptions

When he&#039;s not engaged in the pop-sociological project of chronicling the tastes and habits of the bourgeois bohemian class to which he desperately wants to belong, the conservative David Brooks, for example, displays a keen interest in -- if not a deep knowledge of -- world affairs, and has recently been spotted on the Lehrer News Hour offering his lively opinions on the situation in Iraq.  And though the liberal Katha Pollitt will sometimes weigh in on the situation of women in Afghanistan, it&#039;s clear that her orientation is basically local: as a feminist -- and thus as the spokesperson of a narrow special interest group -- Pollitt&#039;s interests and concerns are largely confined to those 140 million or so women who inhabit her own country.  But by and large [reiterate first two paragraphs...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This is a broad generalization and there are, of course, lots of exceptions</p>

	<p>When he&#8217;s not engaged in the pop-sociological project of chronicling the tastes and habits of the bourgeois bohemian class to which he desperately wants to belong, the conservative David Brooks, for example, displays a keen interest in&#8212;if not a deep knowledge of&#8212;world affairs, and has recently been spotted on the Lehrer News Hour offering his lively opinions on the situation in Iraq.  And though the liberal Katha Pollitt will sometimes weigh in on the situation of women in Afghanistan, it&#8217;s clear that her orientation is basically local: as a feminist&#8212;and thus as the spokesperson of a narrow special interest group&#8212;Pollitt&#8217;s interests and concerns are largely confined to those 140 million or so women who inhabit her own country.  But by and large [reiterate first two paragraphs&#8230;]</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2003/05/12/builders-defenders-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kieranhealy.org/wordpress/?p=410#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that the Wall Street Journal ran Totten&#039;s piece because of its quality. I think that they ran it because it was written by a supposed dissident-liberal who criticizes other liberals and praises a particular brand of pro-war conservative. 

One wonders whether the same piece- if it had been written by a conservative writer- would have been published despite its flaws, or whether Totten was given a free pass because he claims to be a liberal.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I don&#8217;t think that the Wall Street Journal ran Totten&#8217;s piece because of its quality. I think that they ran it because it was written by a supposed dissident-liberal who criticizes other liberals and praises a particular brand of pro-war conservative.</p>

	<p>One wonders whether the same piece- if it had been written by a conservative writer- would have been published despite its flaws, or whether Totten was given a free pass because he claims to be a liberal.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
